Active Projects 🏗
23
4 pending audit
Critical Risk ⚠
6
↑ 2 this week
Total BOQ Value 📋
UGX 312B
Under active audit
Avg Cost Overrun 📈
+14.3%
Portfolio average
Portfolio Risk Score
Composite — all active projects
High Risk
Cost Overrun Trend
% overrun across portfolio · 12 months
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
Active Alerts
View all →
Cost Anomaly2h ago
Entebbe Expressway II
Asphalt rate 2.4× benchmark median
Procurement Risk5h ago
Mulago Hospital
Single bidder — tender period 6 days
Quantity Flag1d ago
Kampala Water Supply
Pipe quantities revised +34% in VO-007
Arithmetic Error2d ago
Karuma Bridge Rehab
Item 4.3.1 — UGX 4.2M extension gap
Duplicate Item3d ago
Entebbe Expressway II
Lines 112 & 198 identical, different rates
Top BOQ Anomalies
View all →
Asphalt concrete wearing course
Critical
Submitted
485,000/m³
Benchmark
198,000/m³
Deviation
+145%
Reinforced concrete Class 25
High
Submitted
980,000/m³
Benchmark
720,000/m³
Deviation
+36%
Earthworks — bulk excavation
Medium
Submitted
28,000/m³
Benchmark
42,000/m³
Deviation
−33%
Pipe DN300 HDPE supply & lay
High
Submitted
220,000/m
Benchmark
145,000/m
Deviation
+52%
Project Registry
| Project ID | Project Name | Type | Budget | Risk Level | Overrun | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRJ-001 | Entebbe Expressway Phase II | Roads | UGX 84B | Critical | +23% | Active | Open → |
| PRJ-002 | Mulago Hospital Expansion | Buildings | UGX 31B | High | +11% | Active | Open → |
| PRJ-003 | Karuma Bridge Rehabilitation | Bridges | UGX 12B | Medium | +4% | Audit | Open → |
| PRJ-004 | Northern Bypass Drainage | Drainage | UGX 8.4B | Low | 0% | Complete | Open → |
| PRJ-005 | Kampala Water Supply Upgrade | Water | UGX 22B | High | +18% | Active | Open → |
Risk by Category
Portfolio risk is elevated. 6 projects are operating above the critical threshold, with the Entebbe Expressway Phase II presenting the most significant cost integrity concerns.
The asphalt wearing course rate anomaly (+145% above benchmark) on PRJ-001 requires immediate quantity surveyor review. The deviation pattern is consistent with rate-padding rather than a genuine market premium.
Procurement risk is concentrated in two active contracts. The Mulago Hospital MEP package exhibits single-bidder conditions with an abnormally compressed tender window — a pattern that warrants procurement committee escalation.
These observations are technical in nature and do not constitute allegations of misconduct. Recommend escalation to the responsible audit committee for investigation under applicable procurement regulations.