Active Projects 🏗
23
4 pending audit
Critical Risk ⚠
6
↑ 2 this week
Total BOQ Value 📋
UGX 312B
Under active audit
Avg Cost Overrun 📈
+14.3%
Portfolio average
Portfolio Risk Score
Composite — all active projects
High Risk
Cost Overrun Trend
% overrun · 12 months
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Active Alerts
View all →Cost Anomaly2h ago
Entebbe Expressway II
Asphalt rate 2.4× benchmark median
Procurement Risk5h ago
Mulago Hospital
Single bidder — tender period 6 days
Quantity Flag1d ago
Kampala Water Supply
Pipe quantities revised +34% in VO-007
Arithmetic Error2d ago
Karuma Bridge Rehab
Item 4.3.1 — UGX 4.2M extension gap
Duplicate Item3d ago
Entebbe Expressway II
Lines 112 & 198 identical, different rates
Top BOQ Anomalies
View all →Asphalt concrete wearing courseCritical
Submitted
485K/m³
Benchmark
198K/m³
Dev
+145%
Reinforced concrete Class 25High
Submitted
980K/m³
Benchmark
720K/m³
Dev
+36%
Earthworks — bulk excavationMedium
Submitted
28K/m³
Benchmark
42K/m³
Dev
−33%
Pipe DN300 HDPEHigh
Submitted
220K/m
Benchmark
145K/m
Dev
+52%
Project Registry
| ID | Project Name | Type | Budget | Risk | Overrun | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRJ-001 | Entebbe Expressway Phase II | Roads | UGX 84B | Critical | +23% | Active | Audit → |
| PRJ-002 | Mulago Hospital Expansion | Buildings | UGX 31B | High | +11% | Active | Audit → |
| PRJ-003 | Karuma Bridge Rehabilitation | Bridges | UGX 12B | Medium | +4% | Audit | Audit → |
| PRJ-004 | Northern Bypass Drainage | Drainage | UGX 8.4B | Low | 0% | Complete | — |
| PRJ-005 | Kampala Water Supply Upgrade | Water | UGX 22B | High | +18% | Active | Audit → |
Risk by Category
AI Audit IntelligenceGenerated 14 min ago
Portfolio risk is elevated. 6 projects are operating above the critical threshold, with the Entebbe Expressway Phase II presenting the most significant cost integrity concerns.
The asphalt wearing course rate anomaly (+145% above benchmark) on PRJ-001 requires immediate quantity surveyor review. Consistent with rate-padding, not a genuine market premium.
Procurement risk is concentrated in two active contracts. The Mulago Hospital MEP package exhibits single-bidder conditions with an abnormally compressed tender window — warrants procurement committee escalation.
Technical observations only. No allegations of misconduct. Recommend escalation to responsible audit committee.